Home » Jury Convicts Arroyo Grande Candidate Powell on All Nine Election Fraud Counts

Jury Convicts Arroyo Grande Candidate Powell on All Nine Election Fraud Counts

By

–

Jury Convicts Arroyo Grande Candidate Powell on All Nine Election Fraud Counts

“I may have lost this battle. But this is not the end of the legal fight.” That was Gaea Powell, 63, after a San Luis Obispo County jury found her guilty of election fraud. She says she will pursue post-trial remedies and appeal.

The verdict came on Sept. 21, at the end of a three-week trial. Jurors convicted her on nine counts: eight felonies and one misdemeanor. The charges, filed in April, covered her runs for mayor of Arroyo Grande in 2022 and 2024. Prosecutors said she registered to vote, and filed to run, using a condominium address on James Way inside the city, while she actually lived outside the city limits. The felony counts included election fraud, voter fraud and perjury, and the jury also heard allegations about campaign finance violations.

A defendant with no lawyer

Powell turned down a public defender and represented herself. That slowed the case, and the judge admonished her along the way. At one point he told her she was “increasingly not asking relevant questions.”

Her defense rested on a claim that an Arroyo Grande election official had misled her about residency rules. The Tribune editorial board, which called that argument nonsense, said she had been clearly told she must be a registered voter of the town to run, and that this meant living in it. In her opening statement Powell said, “I did not know anything about elections until about 2022.” In closing she argued that “Being resourceful is not evidence of fraudulent intent.”

She has also said she talked openly about where she lived, asked election officials whether she could run, and believed she was acting lawfully. She told SFGATE she respected the jury’s role but was deeply disappointed, and that she had never knowingly deceived anyone. She also alleged that evidence that would have cleared her was kept out of the trial.

What she faces

Sentencing was set for Oct. 19. The Tribune put her maximum exposure at eight years and seven months in prison, though it noted she has no criminal record and a term that long is unlikely. The district attorney’s office said it was still working out a sentencing recommendation and did not state a maximum. Powell herself told SFGATE she could face as much as eight years in jail.

The editorial board did not call for a lengthy term. Taxpayers, it wrote, had already paid enough for the Powell saga. It still argued for substantial jail time, given that she forced a trial, and pointed to lawsuits she had filed against the county and others. It also asked why nobody around her stepped in. The San Luis Obispo County Republican Party endorsed her twice.

The politics around the case

Powell was no stranger to public life. She is a frequent speaker at local meetings and in 2023 helped organize a Moms for Liberty rally against diversity initiatives at nearby schools. This year she ran for San Luis Obispo County clerk-recorder, the office that oversees all of the county’s elections, pitching voter ID, proof of citizenship and clean voter rolls as ways to build “election legitimacy” and public trust. She finished third in the primary and was knocked out of the general election.

SFGATE set the case beside others in which candidates who campaigned on stricter voting rules ran into the law themselves. It cited Tina Peters, the former Colorado election clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines, and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, whom the California Supreme Court ruled last week broke election law by seizing ballots. The justices wrote that he exposed them to “alteration or tampering.”

For Powell, the next date on the calendar is the courtroom on Oct. 19.

Sources

Get breaking stories first on our Telegram channel.

More stories by

Most read

Crime & Fraud

People in the News

News

World News